1122's ban appeal


xXmrburnsXx  VIP 8 May 19 at 12:01pm
#12
Squanchy has a point. Based on the way of gameplay that I have seen, it does look like an aimbot based on lockpoints rather than hitboxes. It is locked on to the path of a target, rather than on the targets head to prevent that blatant issue. This guy is suspicious at best, cheater at worst.
ARF_Trooper_ [DEFN]  VIP 8 May 19 at 12:24pm
#13
You guys leave out that he locked on to the head of a dead guy’s ragdoll. Squanchy since you have shown to know your way around hacks, please tell me, can a hack client do this? If not, to me at least, it shows he has the ability to do this without a client.
squanchy  Developer 8 May 19 at 12:44pm Edited
#14
If your question wasn't actually rhetorical:

If the script is using an ents.GetAll() loop that's checking for specific models to aim towards to, yes.
If the script is using a player.GetAll() loop, no.
ARF_Trooper_ [DEFN]  VIP 8 May 19 at 1:31pm
#15
Despite this being very fishy, i do not personally believe there is enough evidence for a full ban. Should it be written off entirely? No. However there is more than enough evidence against it to warrant an unban in my opinion. I have been working with lazmin since he first got banned, way before the forums were up. Lazmin and myself have been through a lot before the forums were even up. While it is possible lazmin would lie to me, which i doubt, i fo however believe if he were hacking at this stage he would have given up on the unban and just start using an alt which he has admitted to having but not using consistently. Can it be written off as him not hacking at all? No. However i do believe that there is sufficient evidence against that theory to have him unbanned and watched closely. In addition to this i imagine zed is not an uncommon name and believe linking some of those accounts on other sites was a bit of a stretch. I implore whoever makes this decision to give him another chance and then watch him. If he magically becomes a million times worse then he was hacking. If more concrete proof can be found ban him again. I will inform him to record himself playing at full performance so there can be no more shadow of doubt.
Destitute the :dab:  Chief Executive Officer VIP 8 May 19 at 5:25pm Edited
#16
"I will inform him to record himself playing at full performance so there can be no more shadow of doubt."

That isn't how that works. You can just turn off your cheat client for that.

Also make up your mind, you say he should be unbanned but that he MIGHT be hacking?

Signature:
Don't worry! The Yakuza 4 of us know what to do!

[Image: doomer.jpg]
Combean0007  Community Advisor VIP 9 May 19 at 3:29am
#17
Appeal is reviewed.
Considering video material, side opinions and some minor yet important details, I've come to conclusion that defendant should stay banned.
DENIED.

Signature:
AIU Orpheus
[Image: F9E315C7F9B284DA912DC86DCB17E86D839C7E73]
  • 12 participants


  • Forum Jump