How would this benefit the server? A: Adding these vehicles would bring some fresh content to the vehicle side of the server and would allow for better vehicle gameplay. These vehicles have been TESTED and are not broken. Adding these vehicles would not only increase activity in Tech but allow a more fun interaction between OVA and Tech as it has been some time since either side got new vehicles.
T-108 (Replacement for T90 Don't use T-108 TAC, it has a huge blast radius)
Pros: Better grip and doesn't act like its on ice
Has everything that the T90 had including top gunner
Two skins
Cons: Machine gun sound isn't constant but it is there
Top gunner exposed unknown if they can be hurt
BTR-70 (Replacement for APC)
Pros:
Better model
Good turret and fire rate
Good handling
Cons:
N/A
BTR-80/80A (Replacement for APC and/or addition of light vehicle)
Pros:
Good models
One vehicle can be used as an APC and one can be used as the transport
They work well and turret handling is good
Cons:
Two vehicles in pack so if you choose not to have one or the other it will be left out
KN APC (Addition as a vehicle or replacement for APC)
Pros:
Its basically the combine APC with rockets but it has a slower main gun fire rate and it has a max of 2 rockets which take a few seconds to reload
Good main and secondary gun
im all for the btr/apcs but we already have a sherman and a t90 for tanks so no need for an extra tank. current apc looks kinda bad and stale imo, any of these would look great as just a replacement
+1 to the replacement of the APC (either the BTR70 or the BTR80 because both posses the Russified Cold War style of the rebel vehicle arsenal and also because the current APC is uncool as Raven said)
Neutral on replacing the T90
Neutral on adding anything else as a lighter vehicle because;
A. I'm not even entirely sure we have the people to be able to add them in dev-wise
B. The jeep (which I believe tech has!?) would be diminished
C. Entirely new vehicle means lots of vigorous balancing testing & tweaking as well as possible rule implementation re-interpretations (for example if the lighter attack vehicle can also transport people would it fit under transport rules? would it be a special attack transport which then means the combine APC should get the no-shooting transport rule revoked to make it on par? Just some discussions I'd foresee)
Still a cool suggestion and cool as hell for suggesting in the first place!
Signature:
Combine Planetary Commander
"If I'm not causing someone else to have a stroke, then I am definitely having one."
Discord Username:
A:Absentdon#8593
Steam ID:
A:STEAM_0:1:462451624
Workshop Link: (If applicable)
A:
T108 https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/f...text=T-108
BTR-70 https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/f...ext=BTR-70
BTR-80/80A https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/f...ext=BTR-80
NK APC https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/f...mfphys+APC
What is your suggestion?
A: Add the following vehicles for Tech
How would this benefit the server?
A: Adding these vehicles would bring some fresh content to the vehicle side of the server and would allow for better vehicle gameplay. These vehicles have been TESTED and are not broken. Adding these vehicles would not only increase activity in Tech but allow a more fun interaction between OVA and Tech as it has been some time since either side got new vehicles.
T-108 (Replacement for T90 Don't use T-108 TAC, it has a huge blast radius)
Pros:
Better grip and doesn't act like its on ice
Has everything that the T90 had including top gunner
Two skins
Cons:
Machine gun sound isn't constant but it is there
Top gunner exposed unknown if they can be hurt
BTR-70 (Replacement for APC)
Pros:
Better model
Good turret and fire rate
Good handling
Cons:
N/A
BTR-80/80A (Replacement for APC and/or addition of light vehicle)
Pros:
Good models
One vehicle can be used as an APC and one can be used as the transport
They work well and turret handling is good
Cons:
Two vehicles in pack so if you choose not to have one or the other it will be left out
KN APC (Addition as a vehicle or replacement for APC)
Pros:
Its basically the combine APC with rockets but it has a slower main gun fire rate and it has a max of 2 rockets which take a few seconds to reload
Good main and secondary gun
Cons:
N/A
neutral
Head Administrator x2
LVET 2LT
NPU Fortress OFC-III
Military Police Captain
ECHO OFC-I
SWORD OFC-I
Neutral on replacing the T90
Neutral on adding anything else as a lighter vehicle because;
A. I'm not even entirely sure we have the people to be able to add them in dev-wise
B. The jeep (which I believe tech has!?) would be diminished
C. Entirely new vehicle means lots of vigorous balancing testing & tweaking as well as possible rule implementation re-interpretations (for example if the lighter attack vehicle can also transport people would it fit under transport rules? would it be a special attack transport which then means the combine APC should get the no-shooting transport rule revoked to make it on par? Just some discussions I'd foresee)
Still a cool suggestion and cool as hell for suggesting in the first place!
-1 on the T-108, no
+1 for APC
lovely