Pathfinder's ban appeal


[DEFN] Zmurfus  VIP 8 Jul 19 at 3:23pm
#12
The RU was inside the building the CWU was outside, the gun was away before the door closed and then when the door reopened the RU had no idea of which CWU had the gun without metagaming.

Signature:
Zmurfus/Zephyr
[Image: tenor.gif?itemid=12617528]
MinimalOverwatch  Affairs Counselor VIP 8 Jul 19 at 3:24pm
#13
I had, lmao. It was less than second. He also was talking constantly, so I could recognize him. I use simple logic and deduction, therefore it is not RDM nor Metagame'
bog bog bog man  VIP 8 Jul 19 at 3:26pm
#14
Bruh he was 1 step left of his original position how is that not "no Idea of which CWU had the gun" of course he had an idea
FromTheDepthsᴰᴱᶠᴺ  VIP 8 Jul 19 at 3:37pm Edited
#15
Modified(lowered to a day)
Both sides are correct in their own ways. While Zmurf is correct in stating that the Warn does carry over regardless of how long ago it was the punishment should not have been as heavy of one since you have a decent argument against it. Although you could still have rdmed someone you did take the chance to kill him when it could have been someone else. Due to no side being 100% right the ban is being reduced to one day.

Closed and Moved.

Signature:

Only The Dead have seen the End of War - Plato

Ex Head Administrator
[Image: DiscreteClosedHydra-size_restricted.gif]
  • 4 participants


  • Forum Jump