(21 Jul 21 at 6:48pm)[DEFN] Aithead Wrote: RPGs are supposed to be individually weaker than vehicles. RPGs have no consequence to using them and require nothing to deploy, AND can respawn on their squadmates. Instead of immediately telling me why i'm wrong and can't possibly be right, think about how powerful that is.

Every single argument regarding vehicles vs RPGs has the exact same 6 valid points (3 per side) and everything else is just opinion on how strong vehicles actually should be and whether or not ONE person with an RPG should be enough to counter them. Legit every argument has those same points, and they rarely become less valid per side, but it's pretty obnoxious to listen to them over and over again. Maybe both sides should just switch places and actually play the other side so you can realize how incredibly annoying your opposition is to play against.

Could you elaborate those 6 valid points for the dumb people like me.

ur are lier oz

(21 Jul 21 at 6:52pm)ozz12231 Wrote:

(21 Jul 21 at 6:41pm)BOT Pieswick Wrote: First point is a lie, it's just that combine heli's have larger spread, it is not impossible.
Hunter is not fucked, it's a perfect jeep counter
Then be careful with positioning?
Techs dont get kicked in, ballistas are rarely on

U didnt even read my thing i said rebels helis i didnt even say combine in the first point only the (some can but extremely hard as u can see on the discord server (combine) i asked about it gunship only can do that and still extremely hard)

Second i will gladly give u hunter and i get 3 people with rpgs and see who will win u dont drive vehicles (alteast not after the nerf) i never said its shit i said only against hvys is suffering (its anti vehicle class i get it but more damage is going to be fky fky at this point) lets make it one shoot the hunter what about that

Are u tech tho? Im tech and got kicked today that prove my point

Note : plz read my words carefully before calling me a lier

I read it perfectly, I was simply explaining why combine vehicles shoot it down easier.
3 people with RPGs? I rarely ever see 3 heavies on.
I was tech pretty recently since the nerfs at the least, it's a class that rewards skill, unlike most.

> 3 people with RPGs? I rarely ever see 3 heavoes on.

WELL THAT IS ABOUT TO CHANGE!

(21 Jul 21 at 7:01pm)BOT Pieswick Wrote:

(21 Jul 21 at 6:52pm)ozz12231 Wrote:

(21 Jul 21 at 6:41pm)BOT Pieswick Wrote: First point is a lie, it's just that combine heli's have larger spread, it is not impossible.
Hunter is not fucked, it's a perfect jeep counter
Then be careful with positioning?
Techs dont get kicked in, ballistas are rarely on

U didnt even read my thing i said rebels helis i didnt even say combine in the first point only the (some can but extremely hard as u can see on the discord server (combine) i asked about it gunship only can do that and still extremely hard)

Second i will gladly give u hunter and i get 3 people with rpgs and see who will win u dont drive vehicles (alteast not after the nerf) i never said its shit i said only against hvys is suffering (its anti vehicle class i get it but more damage is going to be fky fky at this point) lets make it one shoot the hunter what about that

Are u tech tho? Im tech and got kicked today that prove my point

Note : plz read my words carefully before calling me a lier

I read it perfectly, I was simply explaining why combine vehicles shoot it down easier.
3 people with RPGs? I rarely ever see 3 heavies on.
I was tech pretty recently since the nerfs at the least, it's a class that rewards skill, unlike most.

I mean hearing from the buff, 400 damage a rocket is less skill rewarding but simply point, click, steer, repeat.

By my original post I meant that it is simply way too nonrewarding for heavies, as both hunter and dropship (the most common air vehicles combines have) can shot down the rockets, and even rather mediocre foxtrot can stay pretty much intact by just looking around holding Alt

(21 Jul 21 at 7:01pm)TheJC Wrote: ur are lier oz

:c

(21 Jul 21 at 6:56pm)Bel1ve. Wrote:

(21 Jul 21 at 6:48pm)[DEFN] Aithead Wrote: RPGs are supposed to be individually weaker than vehicles. RPGs have no consequence to using them and require nothing to deploy, AND can respawn on their squadmates. Instead of immediately telling me why i'm wrong and can't possibly be right, think about how powerful that is.

Every single argument regarding vehicles vs RPGs has the exact same 6 valid points (3 per side) and everything else is just opinion on how strong vehicles actually should be and whether or not ONE person with an RPG should be enough to counter them. Legit every argument has those same points, and they rarely become less valid per side, but it's pretty obnoxious to listen to them over and over again. Maybe both sides should just switch places and actually play the other side so you can realize how incredibly annoying your opposition is to play against.

Could you elaborate those 6 valid points for the dumb people like me.

I don't want to lol, you can probably puzzle them out just from this forum post and/or one of the other recent Vehicle/RPG related forums posts. There ARE more than 6 but 6 is a nice even number that represents what I think of it almost perfectly.

Vehicles' price has been cut down drastically, in the latest updates their damage output also was raised. It doesn't make sense to me that foxtrots get better stuff that we, heavies, are supposed to counter using our old tools, that are not quite ready for this

(21 Jul 21 at 7:19pm)An Even Wilder Egg Wrote: Vehicles' price has been cut down drastically, in the latest updates their damage output also was raised. It doesn't make sense to me that foxtrots get better stuff that we, heavies, are supposed to counter using our old tools, that are not quite ready for this

I think only dropship is less RES now because its transport vehicles and not supposed to attack only
I might be blind if other vehicles res got cut down