(29 Jun 22 at 9:27am)Bel1ve. Wrote:

(29 Jun 22 at 9:06am)Velk.ca Clone Boi Wrote: -1 We have Ration dispenser from COUGH COUGH CWU

Only thing ration dispenser provides is HP increase contrary to the suggestion which would provide more than just HP

Still tryna make it like Dark RP. -1 still

(29 Jun 22 at 10:15am)Velk.ca Clone Boi Wrote:

(29 Jun 22 at 9:27am)Bel1ve. Wrote:

(29 Jun 22 at 9:06am)Velk.ca Clone Boi Wrote: -1 We have Ration dispenser from COUGH COUGH CWU

Only thing ration dispenser provides is HP increase contrary to the suggestion which would provide more than just HP

Still tryna make it like Dark RP. -1 still

That is entirely based off of opinion and how the suggestion would be implemented.
You are just taking a shitty argument into account on my remark regarding your comment.

(29 Jun 22 at 10:26am)Bel1ve. Wrote:

(29 Jun 22 at 10:15am)Velk.ca Clone Boi Wrote:

(29 Jun 22 at 9:27am)Bel1ve. Wrote:

(29 Jun 22 at 9:06am)Velk.ca Clone Boi Wrote: -1 We have Ration dispenser from COUGH COUGH CWU

Only thing ration dispenser provides is HP increase contrary to the suggestion which would provide more than just HP

Still tryna make it like Dark RP. -1 still

That is entirely based off of opinion and how the suggestion would be implemented.
You are just taking a shitty argument into account on my remark regarding your comment.

Actually no, it's quite a solid argument. Adding a bunch of shit that turns CvR into something that it isn't. Particularly in the vein of making it seem more "modernized" or "more like DarkRP."
Ghost, you've been playing this server long enough to know that CvR doesn't need all this shit to be fun. You're grasping at straws trying to find a good suggestion, and a lot of people would agree that this is something that certainly would NOT be added.

People can have their opinion about how dumb your suggestion is and that's just how the world works. Get over it.

(29 Jun 22 at 10:26am)Bel1ve. Wrote:

(29 Jun 22 at 10:15am)Velk.ca Clone Boi Wrote:

(29 Jun 22 at 9:27am)Bel1ve. Wrote:

(29 Jun 22 at 9:06am)Velk.ca Clone Boi Wrote: -1 We have Ration dispenser from COUGH COUGH CWU

Only thing ration dispenser provides is HP increase contrary to the suggestion which would provide more than just HP

Still tryna make it like Dark RP. -1 still

That is entirely based off of opinion and how the suggestion would be implemented.
You are just taking a shitty argument into account on my remark regarding your comment.

So who'd actually play civi and anarchist then? CWU already has businesses and ration dispenser so idk

(29 Jun 22 at 1:20pm)bed crabs Wrote:

(29 Jun 22 at 10:26am)Bel1ve. Wrote:

(29 Jun 22 at 10:15am)Velk.ca Clone Boi Wrote:

(29 Jun 22 at 9:27am)Bel1ve. Wrote:

(29 Jun 22 at 9:06am)Velk.ca Clone Boi Wrote: -1 We have Ration dispenser from COUGH COUGH CWU

Only thing ration dispenser provides is HP increase contrary to the suggestion which would provide more than just HP

Still tryna make it like Dark RP. -1 still

That is entirely based off of opinion and how the suggestion would be implemented.
You are just taking a shitty argument into account on my remark regarding your comment.

Actually no, it's quite a solid argument. Adding a bunch of shit that turns CvR into something that it isn't. Particularly in the vein of making it seem more "modernized" or "more like DarkRP."
Ghost, you've been playing this server long enough to know that CvR doesn't need all this shit to be fun. You're grasping at straws trying to find a good suggestion, and a lot of people would agree that this is something that certainly would NOT be added.

People can have their opinion about how dumb your suggestion is and that's just how the world works. Get over it.

}
It is basing off of the fact that CWU is there with a ration dispenser which means an additional system for anarchist/civilian to activitely do something is unnecessary.

Then when confronted about the matter not being the same as a ration dispenser he pulled the no darkrp. Just cause you see darkrp doesn't mean it is.
Again for if you haven't realized, IT IS NOT IMPLEMENTED BUT A SUGGESTIOn WHICH MEANS IT CAN BE ADJUSTED AND OR CHANGED TO FIT THE SERVER.

FYI it is a 33/33/33 so not everyone but a third. It is simply a suggestion (again). If you dislike it cool, but don't bring up bs arguments like what was stated prior then say "-1 darkrp lol" when you don't even know how it ACTUALLY would look like in a finished edition.

if you prefer the shoot, kill, die with a few objectives here and there go ahead.

This suggestion is simply to add more to what we already have while also attempting to revive a dead class.
Since you are also a long term player you SHOULD be aware that anarchist is not in it's greatest position right now and this is a suggestion makes their position less worse than it already is. better off bringing something than nothing to the table.

FYI making stupid remarks is not really forming opinion it is unnecessary and clutters up the suggestion as a whole. Go do that in a different thread.

Sure dude. Reviving a "dead class" is totally a reason to completely switch up what CvR is known for.
Anarchist provides nothing to the server and has never provided anything to the server other than discourse and problems. I could give a shit less what "position" Anarchist is in. Cuz I don't give a damn about the class as a whole. It's boring as fuck. End of story.

(29 Jun 22 at 1:58pm)bed crabs Wrote: Sure dude. Reviving a "dead class" is totally a reason to completely switch up what CvR is known for.
Anarchist provides nothing to the server and has never provided anything to the server other than discourse and problems. I could give a shit less what "position" Anarchist is in. Cuz I don't give a damn about the class as a whole. It's boring as fuck. End of story.

So you decide to go on a rant about how big this will be when implemented and it'll be too much darkrp?
When the classes will have something to ACTUALLY do when played on?
When the classes will give minuscule bonuses?

weird of you to comment then, rather than simply voting.

if you prefer not to commit to any betterment of the server and preferably see a class die than be improved to something better it is better off you don't comment onwards cause you'd rather see the fall than the rise of it. Again, better to provide some sort of solution than mald when there is a solution presented.

(29 Jun 22 at 2:04pm)Bel1ve. Wrote:

(29 Jun 22 at 1:58pm)bed crabs Wrote: Sure dude. Reviving a "dead class" is totally a reason to completely switch up what CvR is known for.
Anarchist provides nothing to the server and has never provided anything to the server other than discourse and problems. I could give a shit less what "position" Anarchist is in. Cuz I don't give a damn about the class as a whole. It's boring as fuck. End of story.

So you decide to go on a rant about how big this will be when implemented and it'll be too much darkrp?
When the classes will have something to ACTUALLY do when played on?
When the classes will give minuscule bonuses?

weird of you to comment then, rather than simply voting.

if you prefer not to commit to any betterment of the server and preferably see a class die than be improved to something better it is better off you don't comment onwards cause you'd rather see the fall than the rise of it. Again, better to provide some sort of solution than mald when there is a solution presented.

You completely misunderstand the direction of my comments. The shit you are trying to add to the server would cause a drastic change in how the server works. Namely the drugs, but also the food. I would love to see a change in how civilians and anarchists work but at the same time, this is not a server that would willingly add more shit that can make people overpowered, and the same time, confuse newer players and also veterans.

It also will put people off from the idea because of how stupid it is.
And yes, I did vote. I voted that this suggestion was bad, because it is bad.
I went on a rant because I decided to speak my mind instead of holding myself back from calling you out and your stupid suggestion. You've been nothing but apprehensive and smug this entire time.
Weird of you to try and twist the conversation and narrative, rather than simply trying to understand where I'm coming from.

---

But sure dude. Go nuts. 

(29 Jun 22 at 2:09pm)bed crabs Wrote:

(29 Jun 22 at 2:04pm)Bel1ve. Wrote:

(29 Jun 22 at 1:58pm)bed crabs Wrote: Sure dude. Reviving a "dead class" is totally a reason to completely switch up what CvR is known for.
Anarchist provides nothing to the server and has never provided anything to the server other than discourse and problems. I could give a shit less what "position" Anarchist is in. Cuz I don't give a damn about the class as a whole. It's boring as fuck. End of story.

So you decide to go on a rant about how big this will be when implemented and it'll be too much darkrp?
When the classes will have something to ACTUALLY do when played on?
When the classes will give minuscule bonuses?

weird of you to comment then, rather than simply voting.

if you prefer not to commit to any betterment of the server and preferably see a class die than be improved to something better it is better off you don't comment onwards cause you'd rather see the fall than the rise of it. Again, better to provide some sort of solution than mald when there is a solution presented.

You completely misunderstand the direction of my comments. The shit you are trying to add to the server would cause a drastic change in how the server works. Namely the drugs, but also the food. I would love to see a change in how civilians and anarchists work but at the same time, this is not a server that would willingly add more shit that can make people overpowered, and the same time, confuse newer players and also veterans.

It also will put people off from the idea because of how stupid it is.
And yes, I did vote. I voted that this suggestion was bad, because it is bad.
I went on a rant because I decided to speak my mind instead of holding myself back from calling you out and your stupid suggestion. You've been nothing but apprehensive and smug this entire time.
Weird of you to try and twist the conversation and narrative, rather than simply trying to understand where I'm coming from.

I was talking about the fact that the reasoning of the response of the player saying "-1 darkrp lol" was unconstructive and had no additional value to the thread. Which you then decided to defend and state that you didn't care about anarchist.

not denying the fact that it'll impact the server (food) but drugs I can argue.

And I don't. And I'm sure a majority of the players don't care either.